Are you sure, you want to add Chloe
to your wish list?
Storyline:
Catherine and David, she a doctor, he a professor, are at first glance the perfect couple. Happily married with a talented teenage son, they appear to have an idyllic life. But when David misses a flight and his surprise birthday party, Catherine's long simmering suspicions rise to the surface. Suspecting infidelity, she decides to hire an escort to seduce her husband and test his loyalty. Catherine finds herself 'directing' Chloe's encounters with David, and Chloe's end of the bargain is to report back, the descriptions becoming increasingly graphic as the meetings multiply.
Any troubles with internet connection? Your downloads are breaking every time? Just install any of these download software for free and forget about this problem! If you are using Mozilla Firefox browser you can install free add-on Downthemall or Free download manager For Linux OS user wxDownloadFast Mac OS users can choose FolX download manager Any software supporting video format will do. We recommend you using Media Player Classic with K-Lite Mega Codec Pack to play movies downloaded to your computer.
Comments
analafanatica
So bad I won't even write more...
brownrf
felt embarrassed for lead actors
laurikey
OK, so we know that Liam Neeson and Julianne Moore's characters need some more pizzazz in their marriage. I understand that the mind can bring out one's insecurities, one's passions, and one's imagination. HOWEVER, if a filmmaker is going to add some psycho pathology to the story, can he/she please not insult the viewer's intelligence and please provide some character depth to the "villain"? The director is counting on the audience's love of erotic allusions, and love for the 2 lead actors, but the character development was basically nonexistent, especially of Chloe. Is that intentional? Even if so, then we need to know more about what makes the husband and wife's relationship so troubled. This was one weird movie that tried too hard to be one part psychological study, other part erotica, and both laid flat.
lovestalentmoviefan
...at what was supposed to be a cerebral,as well as an erotic, psychological thriller. I am really surprised at this,considering Neeson and Moore are such solid artists. In fact, such graphic nudity and sexuality in movies is extremely distasteful to me,and against what I believe should be put on film.However I was intrigued by idea of seeing what these two Hollywood mainstays would do with it.Although Moore's work was extremely satisfying,the dialogue and context were what was missing. Neeson was average,and Seifried's role could have been played by almost any actress in the age range. The graphic dialogue took away the sensuality of women and their thoughts and fantasys--even their "M.O.s" so to speak. Chloe's opening dialogue with the "peeking" at her getting dressed was more erotic than a graphic sex scene,and the director should have kept at that level of vicariousness for the audience.Good potential in story,would have been better with more story and less blatancy and pornograph
So bad I won't even write more...