Are you sure, you want to add Hindustani
to your wish list?
Storyline:
Circa the British rule in India, a man named Senapathy decides to rebel against the British in a violent way, learns a rare martial art that enables him to kill with his bare hands, and travels to Singapore, joins the Indian Liberation Army formed by renowned Subhash Chandra Bose, is one of the soldier's to engage the British into war. He subsequently joins a death squad in order to destroy British tanks. While all of the others succeed in carrying out their mission, Senapathy is captured, jailed, beaten, and mercilessly tortured by the British. Upon his release, he is looked after by a woman named Namrata, whose honor he had saved from the British - who had captured two truckloads of women protesters, burned their clothing, and forced them to commit suicide. Namrata and Senapathy marry, India gains independence, and they soon have two children - Chandrabose and Kasthoori. Years later Chandra quarrels with his honest and straight-laced father...
Sorry, but movie isn't available now.
You can order movie and get notification when it will appear in out store.
No charges will take for this operation.
Any troubles with internet connection? Your downloads are breaking every time? Just install any of these download software for free and forget about this problem! If you are using Mozilla Firefox browser you can install free add-on Downthemall or Free download manager For Linux OS user wxDownloadFast Mac OS users can choose FolX download manager Any software supporting video format will do. We recommend you using Media Player Classic with K-Lite Mega Codec Pack to play movies downloaded to your computer.
I expected more, did not compare to the older ones... with the technology, it should have been better
elibutton
I thought this movie was pretty good in regards to the return of Indiana Jones. It brought back some good memories from the past Indys with the stunts, action, and acheological mystique and storyline. Some parts may remind you of Back to the Future as well as National Treasure. Shia LaBeouf doesn't "overdo it" in his acting performance as he usually does which makes it a more pleasant blend between him and Harrison Ford. It was great to see Karen Allen's character back (Marion) as well, although it's been so long since the last Indiana Jones you may not be able to recall their relationship's dynamics. The scenes and sets were done in typcial Lucas / Speilberg fashion - - big, bold, and glamorous. Cate Blanchett also did a great job playing the Russian villan, a definite GO for this movie if you're fan of Indiana Jones and action movies.
NICKDOLL
Crystal Skull is most definitely a true blue Indiana Jones film. That being said, it is the worst of the Indiana Jones films. Not that that is all bad. I'd still take Crystal Skull over any modern action film (Spider-Man, Pirates, Casino Royale, and Iron Man included).
Anyone and everyone should see Crystal Skull, Indy fan or not, as it is the best movie is a long, long time.
Still, when stacked up against the classics, it does fall short (just barely).
SPOILERS:
The Good:
Great actions scenes. The opening at Area 5 is great as is the motorcycle chase and the graveyard fight. Good characters and Macguffin. Looks like an 80s film, is witty, really, almost classic Jones.
The Bad:
2nd half losses me a little bit. Mutt is a little worrisome and the scene with the monkeys is awful. Too much CGI in River Boat scene and often times dialog is too on the nose. Didn't really care for the ending either (riding into sunset is better).
blufire1rmc
As an Indiana Jones fan who never had the opportunity to see one of the movies in theaters, I was cautiously optimistic for the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. George Lucas has of late been really disappointing (i.e. all of the recent Star Wars), relying on CGI to make movies instead of good writing/directing. However, I figured with Spielberg around to keep him in check, Lucas might be able to reclaim his stake in making good movies. I have to say after seeing the movie, I am very disappointed. Lucas snuck in his CGI, or course, and I can forgive that. However, much of the movie is so ridiculous it takes you out of the experience. The Indiana Jones series has always used the supernatural and sometimes absurd as plot devices, but this was too much. The movie is worth seeing just for Harrison Ford returning to the role, but this is no Indiana Jones movie in my book.
redfueldelux
I along with many other fans have eagerly awaiting Indy's return for 19 long years! Honestly, this should have happened 10 years ago.But apparently Lucas was busy writing stellar dialogue for Jar Jar Binks.You would think that with such a long wait,this would rival if not surpass the previous 3.Right?Wrong!!The first 3 movies were all epic in scope,shot on location-And the stunts,while outrageous at times,were for the most part plausible as they used old-school stuntwork.However as with the current trend in todays movies,Kingdom follows suite with 90% green screen locale& sets,and totally unrealistic digitized action scenes.Even the animals were CG.I just rolled my eyes when Shiloe started swinging through the trees with digital monkeys.I at no time felt they were in the jungles of South America.As for the story,while aliens are always cool,it does not fit with Indy at all.I can understand Connery's refusal.I really wanted to like this one,but was hugely disappointed! 2 out of 5 DJJ
I expected more, did not compare to the older ones... with the technology, it should have been better